微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025濠电姴鐥夐弶搴撳亾濡や焦鍙忛柣鎴f绾惧潡鏌熸潏鍓х暠缂佺媭鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏�04闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢敂钘変罕闂佺粯鍔曢幖顐ょ不椤栫偞鐓ラ柣鏇炲€圭€氾拷26闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢敃鈧粣妤佺箾閹存瑥鐏╃紒鐙€鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢妶鍌氫壕婵ḿ鍘у▍宥団偓瑙勬磻閸楁娊鐛崶顒夋晢濠电姴鎳夐崑鎾诲锤濡や胶鍙嗛梺缁樻礀閸婂湱鈧熬鎷�闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氬┑掳鍊楁慨瀵告崲濮椻偓閻涱喛绠涘☉娆愭闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟�
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > simulation of tapered coupler in HFSS or CST

simulation of tapered coupler in HFSS or CST

时间:03-30 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hi
I have a broad band tapered coupler
I simulate it in ADS momentum but when want to simulate Full wave by HFSS and CST the result are very different from ADS result?
why?

Hi,
I use CST to simulate of tapered slot antenna (vivaldi) and when I measure the antenna (that I create by using CST), it find that the results from CST and measurement are the same. So, I no have idea about ADS.

I am having same problem with results difference when comparing genesys momentumGX results with CST MWS results.
I suppose this is because of meshing types used in momentum and CST (hexahedral mesh type) are different. In my case, I simulate coupled microstrip filter in a hairpin topology, with 75 degrees angles, so edges of lines are not parallel with CST generated mesh, this should give accuracy loss in CST.
However, I was attempting to make finer mesh into CST, and still have about 4dB S[1,1], S[2,2] difference between CST and genesys...

Would appritiate any help about why does this difference appears.

How to generate tappered profile in HFSS or CST?

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top