微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025楠烇拷04閺堬拷03閺冿拷 閺勭喐婀�閸ワ拷
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 天线设计和射频技术 > Lumped Port Matching for UHF RFID Tag Antenna.

Lumped Port Matching for UHF RFID Tag Antenna.

时间:04-04 整理:3721RD 点击:
I am using a lumped port.

To simulate RFID IC of impedance 27 - 200j,

I have set these values in the Full Port Impedance box for the lumped port.

Then I am checking the Z parameters and S11, the place where S11 is the least(approx -20 dB), I get the least value in the im(Z) plot.

Doesn't HFSS follow conjugate matching?

If yes where is my analysis going wrong?

Can someone please explain how the below plots

閸旂姾娴囨稉锟�...



閸旂姾娴囨稉锟�...



閸旂姾娴囨稉锟�...



are correct?

We want to increase the read range of the tag. Thus should we go for Perfect Matching or Conjugate Matching? The impedance of chip around 27 - 200j. Should we design the tag antenna to of input impedance 27 - 200j or 27 + 200j?

If you set the Characteristic Impedance as Input Impedance of the RFID IC in HFSS simulation set-up and you have found S11=-16dB, Antenna Impedance is approx. conjugate of Input Impedance of the RFIC IC.
What else you are expecting ? Have I misunderstood something ?

When I go - Results -> Create Model Solution Data Report -> Rectangular Plot -> Z parameter -> re or im,
this plot shows the input impedance of the antenna right?

You can see the Im(Z) plot, there I don't see the Impedance to be conjugate of -200j i.e. 200j at the best S11 data, whereas the impedance that I see is near -200j, which isn't conjugate matching Zs=Zl*(max. power transfer), but perfect matching, where Zs=Zl(min. reflections).

One more question - Should I go for conjugate matching or perfect matching to get max. read range for passive rfid tag antenna?

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top