GCPW simulation results (HFSS) at: 60-120 GHz
时间:03-31
整理:3721RD
点击:
Hi all,
I hope I can get some advices on this topic
I am trying to simulate a transition from GCPW to Rectangular Waveguide at high frequencies (60-120 GHz).
I had given dimensions for the GCPW:
Line width: W=0.31mm
Gap: G= 0.1mm
Dielectric (ROGERS 5880): H= 0.127mm
therefore I tried to simulate a simple GCPW line, to verify its impedance and other characteristics (see the attached model: BCPW.zip)
I set-up the waveport according to the guidelines of the tutorials and HFSS help but it was impossible to exclude the propagation of high order modes (I am verifying the structure up to 120 GHz), therefore I had to reduce the port width to 1mm.
It seems that the port walls do not interfere too much with the excitation of the port, at least from the attached fundamental mode (Wport 1mm).png file! (am I wrong?)
Unfortunately, the results I am obtaining from the simulation are quite bad.
In spite of being simple BCPW line, the return loss is no better than 10 dB (see RL - IL.png file) and the IL is extremely high.
Anyone could suggest me what is the cause if this high mismatch between the two (identical) ports?
The characteristic impedance has a strong drop-off at high frequency (see Zo.png): should I consider that as normal?
Note: Radiation Boundaries are added to all external faces of the model.
I hope I can get some advices on this topic
I am trying to simulate a transition from GCPW to Rectangular Waveguide at high frequencies (60-120 GHz).
I had given dimensions for the GCPW:
Line width: W=0.31mm
Gap: G= 0.1mm
Dielectric (ROGERS 5880): H= 0.127mm
therefore I tried to simulate a simple GCPW line, to verify its impedance and other characteristics (see the attached model: BCPW.zip)
I set-up the waveport according to the guidelines of the tutorials and HFSS help but it was impossible to exclude the propagation of high order modes (I am verifying the structure up to 120 GHz), therefore I had to reduce the port width to 1mm.
It seems that the port walls do not interfere too much with the excitation of the port, at least from the attached fundamental mode (Wport 1mm).png file! (am I wrong?)
Unfortunately, the results I am obtaining from the simulation are quite bad.
In spite of being simple BCPW line, the return loss is no better than 10 dB (see RL - IL.png file) and the IL is extremely high.
Anyone could suggest me what is the cause if this high mismatch between the two (identical) ports?
The characteristic impedance has a strong drop-off at high frequency (see Zo.png): should I consider that as normal?
Note: Radiation Boundaries are added to all external faces of the model.
results simulation GCPW 相关文章:
- Difference in results of HFSS and ADS
- Results mismatch in ADS 14 and 17 in Co-simulation with lumped/s2p component
- Dissimilarity in FEM Results of Resonant Patch Antenna in HFSS and ADS
- Far Field Results In HFSS
- Why results from EM simulaiton different from schematic simulation?
- Could anyone please help me confirm the Simulation results of ADS2016?