Feko Giving Very Different Results Between Standard and Fine Mesh Settings
时间:03-30
整理:3721RD
点击:
Hi,
I'm trying to design a quadrifilar helix antenna in Feko 7.0 for use in the 2.4GHz band. The antenna is shown below.
The response, specifically the impedance reflection varies quite considerably with different mesh settings. Shown below are the plots for fine and standard meshs. Using a custom mesh with the wire segment length equal to the wire diameter also gives a completely different result. I'm new to Feko and EM simulation in general but I feel the results should not vary this considerably between mesh settings, especially when using the automatic settings.
I would very grateful if anyone could give me a pointer as to what I'm doing wrong or whether this is normal?
Cheers,
Tom
I'm trying to design a quadrifilar helix antenna in Feko 7.0 for use in the 2.4GHz band. The antenna is shown below.
The response, specifically the impedance reflection varies quite considerably with different mesh settings. Shown below are the plots for fine and standard meshs. Using a custom mesh with the wire segment length equal to the wire diameter also gives a completely different result. I'm new to Feko and EM simulation in general but I feel the results should not vary this considerably between mesh settings, especially when using the automatic settings.
I would very grateful if anyone could give me a pointer as to what I'm doing wrong or whether this is normal?
Cheers,
Tom



- Difference in results of HFSS and ADS
- Results mismatch in ADS 14 and 17 in Co-simulation with lumped/s2p component
- Dissimilarity in FEM Results of Resonant Patch Antenna in HFSS and ADS
- Far Field Results In HFSS
- Why results from EM simulaiton different from schematic simulation?
- Could anyone please help me confirm the Simulation results of ADS2016?
