微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长!
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 天线设计和射频技术 > RFPA design simulation PSS Vesus QPSS

RFPA design simulation PSS Vesus QPSS

时间:04-07 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hi,

I am trying to simulate RFPA using spetreRF.
I understand that there are two PSS simulation method. PSS and QPSS.
since QPSS does not assume of periodicity, does it mean that it is more accurate than PSS?

Thanks.

Best Regards,
whlinfei

You will use PSS for PA's..
Or Harmonic Balance..

Completely wrong.

PSS is an expansion by single frequency basis while QPSS is an expansion by multiple frequency bases which have no common divisor frequency each other.

Generally, only one frequency is involved for PA application.
So PSS should be your choice.

See The Designer's Guide Community Forum - Switched capacitor circuit noise simulation

Wrong.

HB is one of analysis method for "PSS".
See my appends in https://www.edaboard.com/thread194649.html

In Cadence Spectre, HB-PSS and Shooting-Newton-PSS are available as "PSS" analysis.
In Cadence Spectre, HB-QPSS and Shooting-Newton-QPSS are available as "QPSS" analysis.

In Agilent ADSsim, only HB-PSS is available as "PSS" analysis.
In Agilent ADSsim, only HB-QPSS is available as "QPSS" analysis.

In Agilent GoldenGate simulator, Harmonic-Balance, Time-Shooting and Time-Balance algorithms are available as "PSS" analysis.
In Agilent GoldenGate simulator, only Harmonic-Balance algorithms is available as "QPSS" analysis.

In Synopsys HSPICE, HB-PSS and Shooting-Newton-PSS are available as "PSS" analysis.
In Synopsys HSPICE, only HB-QPSS is available as "QPSS" analysis.

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top