微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长!
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 天线设计和射频技术 > How can I simulate tapping point in ADS?

How can I simulate tapping point in ADS?

时间:04-04 整理:3721RD 点击:
Is there a way to simulate s-param changing tapping point of M-Line in ADS?
I've tried with two M-Lines and putting terminal in between but wondered if there is a better way to simulate the circuit.
Thanks in advance.

What are you talking about? Show a screenshot, please.

What do you mean by “M-Line” ?
Use correct terminology ?

Do you mean “mlin” in ADSsim ?



this is what I did and I was wondering if I could get the same simulation result by using only one microstrip line

I guess he means MLIN and searches for MTEE, but the question is unclear indeed.

Use correct terminology



No, two lines is correct.

If your feed from the port is microstrip also, add an MTEE element between the MLINs. That MTEE models the parasitics at the interconnection.

If you want to move the tapping point, use a variable, e.g. "offset" that defaults to 0. Set TL1 length to 3mm - offset and TL2 length to 7.1mm + offset. You can then use parameter sweep or tuning to change that offset variable.

There is no simulator whose name is ?ADS?.
?ADS? is a name of design framework.

?ADSsim? is a correct terminology.

Executable command of simulator is ?adssim?.
Previously it was a ?hpeesofsim?.
However we can still use ?hpeesofsim? as well as ?adssim?.

We use followings to specify syntax in mixed format netlist.

Code:
simulator lang=spectre
simulator lang=spice
simulator lang=adssim

The term ADSsim has been replaced in ADS documentation since ADS 2017.
The correct terminology used in ADS documentation is "Analog/RF simulation".

Cheers,
Volker
(Keysight Certified Expert EDA)

What is a name of simulator command ?

The filenames are still there, but they are not relevant to ADS users. Users select "Simulation" in the ADS schematic menu.

See https://www.edaboard.com/showthread.php?385021
Command of simulator is still ?adssim? and ?hpeesofsim?.

No.

It is necessary for batch processing.
See https://www.edaboard.com/showthread.php?386363

So ?ADSsim? is a correct terminology, since ?simulator lang=adssim? must be used in mixed syntax netlist.
There it is not ?simulator lang=ads?.

True, but unrelated to the question. You have 4 posts in this thread, but zero content useful to ksj1453

That is due to your nonrelevant appends.

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top