difference in simulated result 4 2 element dipole using feko
时间:04-09
整理:3721RD
点击:
Hi
I have simulated 2 dipole above finite ground as given in that paper. in that paper they didnt mention abt type of ground , i used PEC as ground.I didnt give proper radius to dipole as given in paper. From my simulated result i could c 20 db difference between mine and paper result. Can anyone give me the reason 4 it. will ground plane and dipole radius make this difference in result?
I have simulated 2 dipole above finite ground as given in that paper. in that paper they didnt mention abt type of ground , i used PEC as ground.I didnt give proper radius to dipole as given in paper. From my simulated result i could c 20 db difference between mine and paper result. Can anyone give me the reason 4 it. will ground plane and dipole radius make this difference in result?
They are using a 50 to 200 Ohm balun. So in FEKO, maybe try a 200 Ohm characteristic impedance for the S-parameter calculation.
- Measured and simulated reflection coefficient s11 comparison
- Different Ant Impedance simulated CST & HFSS
- measured and simulated S11 of a patch antenna
- Frequency shift in simulated S-Parameters in HFSS
- Huge Discrepancy between simulated and fabricated Antenna
- Does it usually happen that the simulated result and the measurement are not the same
