www.edaboard.com ftopic359036
时间:04-08
整理:3721RD
点击:
Hello group,
my question regards CST MWS:
What is your experience with CST when you simulate two shapes,
e.g. perpendicular microstrips (T-junction, whatever..) alone and
added together with the boolean operation "add".
For sure, you' ill have different results because meshing would be
organized differently.
Now when I want to optimize a structure, I would use the Optimizer,
which uses parameters only for one of the shapes. That is, I will always
simulate with the non-added configuration of my system.
What's your experience, how do you solve this issue in general or
in detail ?
An example.
best wishes
radioCanada
my question regards CST MWS:
What is your experience with CST when you simulate two shapes,
e.g. perpendicular microstrips (T-junction, whatever..) alone and
added together with the boolean operation "add".
For sure, you' ill have different results because meshing would be
organized differently.
Now when I want to optimize a structure, I would use the Optimizer,
which uses parameters only for one of the shapes. That is, I will always
simulate with the non-added configuration of my system.
What's your experience, how do you solve this issue in general or
in detail ?
An example.

best wishes
radioCanada
Hello ,
I found a solution .. ;)
Actually , if you are using 2009 and adding the objects together, you may
still find the parameters within the common object, but on a deeper
level. If you change one parameter it will be updated.
I don't know why this didnt work before in my structure.
Wishes
RadioC
