de-embedding vs response calibration
时间:04-04
整理:3721RD
点击:
Hello,
I have a doubt about de-embedding and response calibration.
I want to model a transistor on-wafer. To do this, I will calibrate on my probe plane using calibration substrate.
After that, I have do de-embed pads and lines to only "see" my transistor. This can be done measuring open and short response and make a model of pads and line. But, it would not be easier, more automatic, to make a response calibration (find a new correction matrix with short and open) to directly measure in the transistor plane?
Like this: http://ena.support.keysight.com/e507...ction_test.htm
I always saw the first way (deembedding), why?
Regards,
wig
I have a doubt about de-embedding and response calibration.
I want to model a transistor on-wafer. To do this, I will calibrate on my probe plane using calibration substrate.
After that, I have do de-embed pads and lines to only "see" my transistor. This can be done measuring open and short response and make a model of pads and line. But, it would not be easier, more automatic, to make a response calibration (find a new correction matrix with short and open) to directly measure in the transistor plane?
Like this: http://ena.support.keysight.com/e507...ction_test.htm
I always saw the first way (deembedding), why?
Regards,
wig
embedding response calibration 相关文章:
- S-Parameters De-embedding using matlab/frequency vector problems
- question about s-parameter de-embedding (picture included)
- Deembedding by Cadence Spectre and ViVA
- de-embedding problem
- Response of the TLINE for different frequencies and lengths
- What is the difference between s-parameter and regular frequency response?
