微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长!
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > etd finite differencefrequency domain

etd finite differencefrequency domain

时间:03-31 整理:3721RD 点击:
hello eveybady, could one of you help me

i want know the difference between (FDfD et DFTD) et (TLM et FDTLM)
ie in the algorithm


thanks

I "think" the methods you are referring to are:

Finite-Difference Frequency-Domain (FDFD)
Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD)
Transmission Line Method (TLM)
Time-Domain Transmission Line Method (TLM)

All four of these methods typically work by fitting the fields and materials to discrete points on a Cartesion grid. The formulation of equations relating the fields through Maxwell's equations is slightly different in each method, but they are all essentially just enforcing Maxwell's equations across the grid.

Time-domain methods have the ability to simulate a device over a very broad frequency range in just a single simulation. A pulse source is typically used so at all points of interest the impulse response is recorded. Fourier transforming the impulse response gives you the spectral response. FDTD has another big advantage in that it does use linear algebra. This mean that if you double the size of your problem, memory and run time only doubles. Other methods, doubling the size of the problem could increase your memory and run time by 4 to 16 times or more! Time-domain methods, however, are poor for modeling highly resonant devices, or devices where the spectral response changes abruptly. In these cases, the frequency-domain methods tend to be more accurate.

Frequency-domain methods tend to be more efficient and accurate for highly resonant devices or when you are only interested in one or two frequency points. They are based on linear algebra so memory and run time increases exponentially with problem size. Typically you convert Maxwell's equations to either A*x=b for scattering problems, or A*x=a*x for eigen-value problems.

I will also say that FDFD is the simplest numerical method I know to implement. It is not as efficient as the finite element method (FEM), but FEM is more tedious to formulate. I will also say that I do not see TLM or TDTLM used nearly as much as FDTD so there is much more literate available for FDTD. Most of this is also applicable to FDFD, but otherwise FDFD can be difficult to find in the literature.

In my Ph.D. dissertation, I describe in good detail a number of numerical methods including:

Finite-Difference Frequency-Domain (FDFD)
Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD)
Plane Wave Expansion Method (PWEM)
Rigorous-Coupled Wave Analysis (RCWA)
String Method
Level Set Method (LSM)
Fast Marching Method (FMM)

You can download it here:

http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0001159


Hope this helps!
-tip

thank you very much for your answer

i want to know which is the expression of excitation in frequency method

thanks

I don't understand your question. Are you asking how to incorporate a source into a frequency-domain method? That depends on the numerical technique you are choosing. There are many types that are all "frequency-domain," For example there is finite element method, finite-difference frequency-domain, method of lines, etc. Which method are you interested in?

-Tip

thank you ,

i'm intersting in FDTLM

thanks

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top