I GOT BIG DIFFERENCE IN SIMULATION USING Q3D AND HFSS?
时间：03-31
整理：3721RD
点击：
WHILE I TRY TO MAKE SIMULATION TO A VIA STRUCTURE USSING BOTH QUASI STATIC(3D) AND FULL WAVE(HFSS) AND TRY TO GET THE RAC,LAC.. FOR BOTH
I GET THE SAME CIRVES SHAPES BUT BIG DIFFERENT IN VALUES
FOR EXAMPLE AT CERTAIN F
R_Q3D=40 mohm RDC_HFSS=70 mohm
L_Q3D=50 PH L_HFSS=17 PH
ANY SUGGESTIONS?
NOTICE: I AM SURE DIMENSION < LAMDA /10 SO THE Q3D IS VALID
I GET THE SAME CIRVES SHAPES BUT BIG DIFFERENT IN VALUES
FOR EXAMPLE AT CERTAIN F
R_Q3D=40 mohm RDC_HFSS=70 mohm
L_Q3D=50 PH L_HFSS=17 PH
ANY SUGGESTIONS?
NOTICE: I AM SURE DIMENSION < LAMDA /10 SO THE Q3D IS VALID
DIFFERENCE BIG SIMULATION 相关文章：
- Difference Perfect E and PEC material
- Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method and metals
- Difference between conducted and radiated emission ?
- Difference of results in probe feed and advanced extension port inIE3D
- Differences and uses for XFDTD,HFSS, and CST
- Finite Difference Frequency Domain (FDFD) tutorial and 2D code