微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025婵犵數濮撮惀澶愬级鎼存挸浜炬俊銈勭劍閸欏繘鏌i幋锝嗩棄缁炬儳娼¢弻鐔告綇閸撗呮殸缂備胶濯崹鍫曞蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈡晜閽樺缃曢梻浣虹帛閸旀洟骞栭銈囦笉妞ゆ牜鍋為悡銉╂煟閺囩偛鈧湱鈧熬鎷�25闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈡晝閳ь剛绮eΔ浣虹闁瑰瓨鐟ラ悘鈺冪磼閻欌偓閸ㄥ爼寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈠Χ閸屾矮澹曞┑顔结缚閸樠冣枍瀹ュ洠鍋撶憴鍕;闁告濞婇悰顕€宕堕澶嬫櫌婵犵數濮撮幊澶愬磻閹捐閿ゆ俊銈勮兌閸欏棝姊虹紒妯荤闁稿﹤婀遍埀顒佺啲閹凤拷濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閹间礁纾绘繛鎴欏灪閸嬨倝鏌曟繛褍鍟悘濠囨⒑閹稿海绠撴い锔诲灣缁顢涢悙瀵稿弳闂佺粯娲栭崐鍦偓姘炬嫹
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > hfss rcs plate

hfss rcs plate

时间:03-31 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hi All,
I'm using HFSS 11 to simulate a infinite flat metal plate. I've created a unit cell, defined master slave boundaries and floquet ports. I parametised the theta scan angle. The problem I'm having is that independent of the incident angle I get reflection coefficient magnitude of 1 for both TM and TE polarizations, which should only happen at normal incidence. Can anyone suggest what I'm doing wrong? I attach the project. Thanks

Did you define the metal by a Drude model? Normally metals are modeled in CST as perfect conductors.

I did not use the Drude model, I just defined a metal as normal in HFSS i.e a metal of finite conductivity. A look at the boundary solver view shows only the surface is highlighted as expected since there is no need for meshes inside the metal. I thought the drude model had to do with the conductivity of the metal rather than the scattering?
The interesting thing is if I put a dielectric in place of the metal, the reflection and transmision matches theory results obtained using fresnel equations.

上一篇:Hello
下一篇:最后一页

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top