微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长!
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 天线设计和射频技术 > Mixer Modeling in RF Systems

Mixer Modeling in RF Systems

时间:04-04 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hello everybody,

I am trying to model a minicircuits mixer MAC85 in ADS as part of a Rx chain. I am confused by some notations on datasheet and how to apply them to my case.

(https://ww2.minicircuits.com/pdfs/MAC-85+.pdf) Datasheet of mixer


1-) In ADS, mixer component asks for port reflections in polar while datasheet is providing the RF/LO and LO/IF isolations. How can I go from isolation to reflection of ports? ( I have an idea going from VSWR to reflection coefficient but im not sure how to do it for all the datapoints.)

2- )My RF_Freq is the received signal while LO signal is my original signal before transmission feeded into mixer by a power divider. Hence I am aiming to go to baseband(someone experienced on this?), with some doppler frequency shift. Can anyone show me a way or some sources on how to tackle the simulation ?

Kind Regards,

ktr

Consider 3 ports S-parameter for frequency conversion device.

Right. You can determine magnitude of S11, S22 and S33.

What do you want to mean ?

What do you want to mean ?

There is no relation between mixer and doppler shift.

Anyway you can build your own custom model by SDD, FDD or Verilog-A.

I think model written by FDD is suitable for your purpose.

I determined S-parameters(11,22,33) of the device, but my data item only accepts a single s-parameter file. Any advice on how to combine them into a single file, although I dont have the S12, S21, S31 etc.

I mean S-parameters are a long touchstone file list for given freqeuncies but the generic mixer device in ADS has these. I dont know what they mean.

It has SP11, SP22 and SP33 as complex and single values for ports.



This is my setup to test mixer and when it downconverts the remaining signal should just go to baseband, but I am not sure what type of simulation I should run to get correct results at output.



When I say modelling, im talking about this primitive approach though, not the extended spice model or sth. I should say, verilog-a or fdd are not things that I know.

Regards,

ktr

I can not understand what you want to mean at all.
Maybe no one can understand it.

However use DAC(Data Access Component).

If you truely require baseband signal processing, there is no option except for Transient Analysis.
And you can not use system model prepaired in ADS, since they are frequency domain models.
You have to build your own custom models based on time domain descriptions.

Learn them.

Many system models prepaired in ADS are written by FDD.

SDD and FDD are behavioral modeling ability of ADSsim native.
On the other hand, Verilog-A is generic and is not restricted to ADSsim.
However you can not utilize full ability of ADSsim if you use Verilog-A.

SDD and Verilog-A are time domain modeling.
FDD is frequency domain modeling.

Advice on FDD and SDD is taken, will spend time on them.

I used data components on ADS before, but they were mostly on 2port devices.

Sorry if I could not get my point through, I should do a better job, you are correct.



1- Those complex S11 etc numbers are what confusing me.

2- Now I have 3 seperate files for S11, S22 and S33 for my mixer. And I dont know how to put all 3 of them into a single data component(is that possible?)
(File input screen is for the 3port device that is standing alone in the right, not connected to the circuit)

Absolutely wrong.
Data components are for any numbers of port.

However use DAC(Data Accesss Component) not Data component.

I can not understand what you are confusing at all.

Use DAC(Data Accesss Component).

In Data Items section there are N-port devices, I used 2-port device there as a means of importing transistor s2p's many times, thats what I am saying.
But still, in that file there were all 4 S parameters of a 2-port.

I am confusing the thing: This mixer will work over a frequency band. So the ports of the mixer should have different reflection coefficients for different frequencies.
But, ADS asks me to write a single complex value. That is the confusing part, it should be useless entering a single value since it should only be meaningful for a single frequency.

What am I missing here?


This one still accepts only a single file.

I can not understand what you want to mean at all.

Use DAC(Data access component).
There "freq" is used as independent variable.

Simply use multiple DACs.

DAC can treat Generic MDIF File.
Touchstone fomat is no more than subset of Generic MDIF.

Survey MDIF and Citi File.

If I had a single s-parameter file for a 3-port network with all the Sij elements in it, it would be simple.
But I have 3 seperate files, and I dont know how to implement that.

I have no idea what that means.


Should I feel ignorant for not knowing these? I learned about s2p format, and it was enough for all this time.

All I am trying to do is simulating a mixer, but I can't figure out how to make my seperate s-parameter files import into "something" ( whether this is a DAC, or a mixer model)





Some guidance on what I should do would help.

Simply combine 3 seperate files to one file as Generic MDIF or Citi file.
You can do this tasks by simple script such as AWK, perl, python, etc.

Or you can do this tasks by ADS's AEL.
Here { } operator is invoked.

Surely search ADS example.
You can see many examples of DACs there.

s2p format has no value.

It is too easy, so no one can explain more.

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top