微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长!
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > for negative dielectric constant, how to set grid size?

for negative dielectric constant, how to set grid size?

时间:04-01 整理:3721RD 点击:
is that lambda/10 rule validate to use? Could anyone help me and refer me some materials to read? many thanks.

Grid resolution should be no larger than lambda/10 where lambda is the smallest wavelength of interest inside the materials with the highest refractive index. You can choose your grid resolution this way:

1. Compute refractive index:

n = sqrt(er*ur);

2. Compute the absolute value of the real part of the refractive index:

n = abs(real(n));

3. Compute grid resolution

dx = lam_min/n/10;


Since you are interested in a negative dielectric constant, are you modeling metals? Are you using FDTD with a dispersion model? If so, there is another pitfall that will make your simulations go unstable. In metals, the refractive index can be less than one and you need to consider this when computing the time step in FDTD. If you are using a frequency-domain simulation, then no worries.

-Tip

Thanks a lot, rrumpf. I got it. Yes, I'm planning to modeling metal.

You may be interested in looking at Chapter 4 of my dissertation. I describe in pretty good detail FDTD for modeling metals. Section 4.3.1 (pp. 102-103) describes the modification for computing the time step for models including metals. In addition, Table 4-1 (pp. 95) lists Lorentz-Drude parameters for several metals.

Find my dissertation here:

https://www.edaboard.com/download.php?id=124081

Good luck!
-Tip

上一篇:G(conductance) parameters
下一篇:最后一页

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top