微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閹绢喗鍎夊鑸靛姇缁狙囧箹鐎涙ɑ灏ù婊呭亾娣囧﹪濡堕崟顓炲闂佸憡鐟ョ换姗€寮婚敐澶婄闁挎繂妫Λ鍕磼閻愵剙鍔ゆ繛纭风節瀵鎮㈤崨濠勭Ф闂佸憡鎸嗛崨顔筋啅缂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸靛垔椤撱垹鍨傞柛顐f礀閽冪喖鏌曟繛鐐珕闁稿妫濋弻娑氫沪閸撗€妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛婵°倗濮烽崑鐐烘偋閻樻眹鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珕闂佽姤锚椤︻喚绱旈弴銏♀拻濞达綀娅g敮娑㈡煕閺冣偓濞茬喖鐛弽顓ф晝闁靛牆娲g粭澶婎渻閵堝棛澧遍柛瀣仱閹繝濡烽埡鍌滃幗闂佸搫娲ㄩ崑娑㈠焵椤掆偓濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹03闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛婵°倗濮烽崑鐐烘偋閻樻眹鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珖闂侀€炲苯澧扮紒顕嗙到铻栧ù锝堟椤旀洟姊洪悷鎵憼闁荤喆鍎甸幃姗€鍩¢崘顏嗭紲闂佺粯鐟㈤崑鎾绘煕閵娿儳鍩g€殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛婵°倗濮烽崑鐐烘偋閻樻眹鈧線寮撮姀鐘栄囨煕鐏炲墽鐓瑙勬礀閳规垿顢欑紒鎾剁窗闂佸憡顭嗛崘锝嗙€洪悗骞垮劚濞茬娀宕戦幘鑸靛枂闁告洦鍓涢敍娑㈡⒑閸涘⿴娈曞┑鐐诧躬閹即顢氶埀顒€鐣烽崼鏇ㄦ晢濠㈣泛顑嗗▍灞解攽閻樺灚鏆╁┑顔芥尦楠炲﹥寰勯幇顒傦紱闂佽宕橀褔鏌ㄩ妶鍡曠箚闁靛牆瀚崗宀勬煕濞嗗繑顥㈡慨濠呮缁辨帒螣閼姐値妲梻浣呵归敃銈咃耿闁秴鐒垫い鎺嶈兌閸熸煡鏌熼崙銈嗗闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌i幋锝呅撻柛濠傛健閺屻劑寮撮悙娴嬪亾閸濄儳涓嶉柡宥庡幗閻撴洘銇勯幇鍓佺ɑ缂佲偓閳ь剛绱掗悙顒€鍔ら柣蹇旂箞閸╃偤骞嬮敂钘変汗闁诲骸婀辨慨鎾夊┑鍫㈢=濞达絽鎼宀勬煕閵娿儳鍩g€殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > Need help with antenna (IE3D) [very urgent plz]

Need help with antenna (IE3D) [very urgent plz]

时间:03-31 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hi every one,
I designed and simulated a single band PIFA, wich has a resonnat frequnecy =1.88 GHz. and a 18 % band width that make it cover DCS PCS and DECT.
the matter is that for all those caractersitcs I refered to the VSWR and S11. So when my professor sow it he told me that it was false and this antenna is not applicable because he told that we must refer to the impedance graph.
I am sure that what I do is just because it is the technique used in all the articles I saw. Son can any one see the attached files and tell me if this antenna is applicable and if my measure method is just.
Please it is very urgent guys thanks in advance.
Best regards.

Hi, Alberich:

I checked it. It is a good design. |S11| is quite low over a wide frequency range. As Zin is concerned, it is close to 50-ohms in a wide frequency range. When 50-ohm normalized |S11| is low, the Zin should be close to 50-ohms.

The only thing you may want to improve is to use Automatic Edge Cells. It will make the results more accurate.

Best regards,

Thanks Dr Jian for ur help,
the matter is that how can I explain to my professor that this design is just, he told me that in the resonnance the Re(Zin) must be maximum, and he told that the resonnance I get is what he called an "anti resonnance" and such as antennas are not applicable.
Really I don't know what to do, I told him that as long as the |S11| is minimum it is a resonnance. and as long as I get a VSWR under 2 it is a band width.
So if u have an answer to that, it would be great.

For the simulation I chked the AEC I make it about 10 %. and the results changes a little bit but it is not a matter.

thanks in advance.
Best regards

I have the same problem, in the f resonance, R is not the max, but near the point of f res, aproxi 5% I have the max of R, so is it acceptable, thanks in advance mr Jian!

Hi, Alberich:

I don't think it is necessary to get R to maximum at the desired frequency. We just need it to have a good match at the frequency. I am not sure why your professor requires you to get R at maximum at the resonant frequency point. Most good antennas do not have such characteristics. Just take the simplest antenna, a thin dipole antenna as an example. Its R is about 73 ohms and X is about 0 when the dipole length L is about 0.475 lambda. If you plot the frequency response of R, it is monotonically increaseing until the L is approaching one wavelength. However, its resonance at about 0.475 lambda is a good one and it is matched to about 75 ohms. It is a good antenna.

Most antennas' reonances are the so-called loaded resonances. At the resonance point, the maxium R and zero X do not happen at the same frequency. I think the most important thing is that you can achieve the desired R (normally 50-ohms) with X = at the frequency you want. It really does not matter whether the R is at maximum at the frequency point. When you achieve the R = Zc and X = 0 at the frequency point, you will get minimum return loss and your antenna achieve the best efficiency and gain for the given configuration.

Regards.

to Alberich:
I am somewhat confused by your statement.

You see, "anti-resonance" means parallel resonance which delivers a maximum R. Your prof. required you to achieve a maximum R while wanting to dump the parallel resonance, how to achieve that?! There is a self-contradiction in your statement.

In my opinion, parallel resonance is not a good situation for proper antenna operation, generally speaking, because then they mostly have too large a R to be matched with common feeding lines.

Added after 27 minutes:

For illustration, I add a set of simulation curves here. Note that the performance of this example is not optimized, just for illustration.

The working status of your antenna is just like around 2.7GHz in my example, where also a best matching appears. Refer to the impedance curve, you can see the antenna is not purely neither parallel resonance nor series resonance.

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top