Metallic losses, COMSOL
时间:03-27
整理:3721RD
点击:
Hi all,
I've been trying to simulate electric field inside a waveguide with
metal rods. But it seems there is less losses than as it should be. I
defined rods as a subdomain with epsilon and sigma but it gives wrong
results, then I tried impedance boundary condition for rods but I
don't know what value to be given the surface electric field, or what
else I can do to observe metallic losses?
Thanks.
I've been trying to simulate electric field inside a waveguide with
metal rods. But it seems there is less losses than as it should be. I
defined rods as a subdomain with epsilon and sigma but it gives wrong
results, then I tried impedance boundary condition for rods but I
don't know what value to be given the surface electric field, or what
else I can do to observe metallic losses?
Thanks.
Setting some proper value for \sigma is the right way. Maybe the provided value was not correct. BTW, how did you check the result?
I think, I've set a proper value for sigma, I checked transmission results from a paper. Anyway, the problem is to define metallic rods is that enough defining as a subdomain and giving parameters? Or should I take skindepth into account, but how? For this I tried to use boundary condition for rods, but still have the same problem.
Thanks
- [Help] Metallic type in IE3D
- Which method is better for analyzing metallic photonic crystals: FDTD or TMM?
- Computing metallic losses for coplanar waveguide | HFSS
- metallic spherical resonator coupled between microstrip lines HFSS
- Metallic Spherical Resonator Coupling Between Microstrip Lines - HFSS Simulation
- metallic via in substrate integrated wave guide