I GOT BIG DIFFERENCE IN SIMULATION USING Q3D AND HFSS?
时间:03-26
整理:3721RD
点击:
WHILE I TRY TO MAKE SIMULATION TO A VIA STRUCTURE USSING BOTH QUASI STATIC(3D) AND FULL WAVE(HFSS) AND TRY TO GET THE RAC,LAC.. FOR BOTH
I GET THE SAME CIRVES SHAPES BUT BIG DIFFERENT IN VALUES
FOR EXAMPLE AT CERTAIN F
R_Q3D=40 mohm RDC_HFSS=70 mohm
L_Q3D=50 PH L_HFSS=17 PH
ANY SUGGESTIONS?
NOTICE: I AM SURE DIMENSION < LAMDA /10 SO THE Q3D IS VALID
I GET THE SAME CIRVES SHAPES BUT BIG DIFFERENT IN VALUES
FOR EXAMPLE AT CERTAIN F
R_Q3D=40 mohm RDC_HFSS=70 mohm
L_Q3D=50 PH L_HFSS=17 PH
ANY SUGGESTIONS?
NOTICE: I AM SURE DIMENSION < LAMDA /10 SO THE Q3D IS VALID
DIFFERENCE BIG SIMULATION 相关文章:
- Differences between MWO and IE3D simulation
- Difference between 2.5D and 3D simulation tools?
- what's the differences between waveport and lumpport in HFSS
- HFSS, Momentum simulation differences
- HFSS 9 vs HFSS 8 : differences between sNp files
- Differences between HFSS Simulation Result and Agil ent's AD