微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025濠电姷鏁告慨鎾儉婢舵劕绾ч幖瀛樻尭娴滅偓淇婇妶鍕妽闁告瑥绻橀弻锝夊箣閿濆棭妫勭紒鐐劤濞硷繝寮婚悢鍛婄秶闁告挆鍛缂傚倷鑳舵刊顓㈠垂閸洖钃熼柕濞炬櫆閸嬪棝鏌涚仦鍓р槈妞ゅ骏鎷�04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫆闁芥ê顦純鏇㈡⒒娴h櫣甯涢柛鏃€娲熼獮鏍敃閵堝洣绗夊銈嗙墱閸嬬偤鎮¢妷鈺傜厽闁哄洨鍋涢埀顒€婀遍埀顒佺啲閹凤拷02闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰缁絽螖娴h櫣顔曢梺鐟扮摠閻熴儵鎮橀埡鍐<闁绘瑢鍋撻柛銊ョ埣瀵濡搁埡鍌氫簽闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴︻敂閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏犖ч柛灞剧煯婢规洖鈹戦缁撶細闁告鍐f瀺鐎广儱娲犻崑鎾舵喆閸曨剛锛涢梺鍛婎殕婵炲﹪鎮伴鈧畷鍫曨敆婢跺娅屽┑鐘垫暩婵挳骞婃径鎰;闁规崘顕ч柨銈嗕繆閵堝嫯鍏岄柛娆忔濮婅櫣绱掑Ο鑽ゎ槬闂佺ǹ锕ゅ﹢閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Ь椤濡甸崟顖氱疀闁告挷鑳堕弳鐘电磽娴e搫顎岄柛銊ョ埣瀵濡搁埡鍌氫簽闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴︻敂閿燂拷
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > power divider ansoft

power divider ansoft

时间:03-24 整理:3721RD 点击:
Whenever you change the pattern of your patches or strips in a T power divider your results are changed why??

Dimensions are kept constant still the results are changed???

why???

Specifically, what pattern, dimension and results are you referring to ?

闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿垂妤e啫绠涘ù锝呮贡缁嬩胶绱撻崒姘偓鐑芥倿閿曚焦鎳岄梻浣告啞閻熴儳鎹㈠鈧濠氭偄绾拌鲸鏅梺鎸庣箓濞诧絽效濡ゅ懏鍋℃繝濠傛噹椤eジ鎮介娑樻诞闁诡喗鐟︾换婵嬪炊閵娧冨妇濠电姷鏁搁崐顖炲焵椤掑嫬纾婚柟鍓х帛閻撴盯鎮楅敐搴′簽濠⒀冪仛閹便劍绻濋崨顕呬哗闂佸湱鎳撶€氱増淇婇幖浣肝ㄩ柨鏃€鍎崇紞鎺楁⒒閸屾瑨鍏岄柟铏崌瀹曠敻寮介鐐殿唵闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟�...





The results were as follows





闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿垂妤e啫绠涘ù锝呮贡缁嬩胶绱撻崒姘偓鐑芥倿閿曚焦鎳岄梻浣告啞閻熴儳鎹㈠鈧濠氭偄绾拌鲸鏅梺鎸庣箓濞诧絽效濡ゅ懏鍋℃繝濠傛噹椤eジ鎮介娑樻诞闁诡喗鐟︾换婵嬪炊閵娧冨妇濠电姷鏁搁崐顖炲焵椤掑嫬纾婚柟鍓х帛閻撴盯鎮楅敐搴′簽濠⒀冪仛閹便劍绻濋崨顕呬哗闂佸湱鎳撶€氱増淇婇幖浣肝ㄩ柨鏃€鍎崇紞鎺楁⒒閸屾瑨鍏岄柟铏崌瀹曠敻寮介鐐殿唵闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟�...



Now the dimensions of the patches are same but but theyve been aligned differently as follows

闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿垂妤e啫绠涘ù锝呮贡缁嬩胶绱撻崒姘偓鐑芥倿閿曚焦鎳岄梻浣告啞閻熴儳鎹㈠鈧濠氭偄绾拌鲸鏅梺鎸庣箓濞诧絽效濡ゅ懏鍋℃繝濠傛噹椤eジ鎮介娑樻诞闁诡喗鐟︾换婵嬪炊閵娧冨妇濠电姷鏁搁崐顖炲焵椤掑嫬纾婚柟鍓х帛閻撴盯鎮楅敐搴′簽濠⒀冪仛閹便劍绻濋崨顕呬哗闂佸湱鎳撶€氱増淇婇幖浣肝ㄩ柨鏃€鍎崇紞鎺楁⒒閸屾瑨鍏岄柟铏崌瀹曠敻寮介鐐殿唵闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟�...



Now the results are different !!!!!!!

闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿垂妤e啫绠涘ù锝呮贡缁嬩胶绱撻崒姘偓鐑芥倿閿曚焦鎳岄梻浣告啞閻熴儳鎹㈠鈧濠氭偄绾拌鲸鏅梺鎸庣箓濞诧絽效濡ゅ懏鍋℃繝濠傛噹椤eジ鎮介娑樻诞闁诡喗鐟︾换婵嬪炊閵娧冨妇濠电姷鏁搁崐顖炲焵椤掑嫬纾婚柟鍓х帛閻撴盯鎮楅敐搴′簽濠⒀冪仛閹便劍绻濋崨顕呬哗闂佸湱鎳撶€氱増淇婇幖浣肝ㄩ柨鏃€鍎崇紞鎺楁⒒閸屾瑨鍏岄柟铏崌瀹曠敻寮介鐐殿唵闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟�...





i need a solid reason ??why are the results changing???
Thanx

Hi

I guess that your results come from an EM-simulation. In that case I do not see it as odd. Your structure is connected differently between the two setups and at 3-4 GHz the allignment of your conductors are not arbitrary.

The first case have two lengths and the second here the length is shorter but wider because they are put right next to each other.

Regards

I cant figure out how to verify that my power is dividing correctly

i calculated the p11= s11*s11 graph vs freq and the rest s22*s22 ,s33*s33

and the values at my freq(3.5ghz) were for p11 0 and p22 0.27 ,p33 0.27, p44 0.27 p55 0.27

I cant figure out why the p11 is coming zero? where could be the fault???

Added after 1 minutes:

闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿垂妤e啫绠涘ù锝呮贡缁嬩胶绱撻崒姘偓鐑芥倿閿曚焦鎳岄梻浣告啞閻熴儳鎹㈠鈧濠氭偄绾拌鲸鏅梺鎸庣箓濞诧絽效濡ゅ懏鍋℃繝濠傛噹椤eジ鎮介娑樻诞闁诡喗鐟︾换婵嬪炊閵娧冨妇濠电姷鏁搁崐顖炲焵椤掑嫬纾婚柟鍓х帛閻撴盯鎮楅敐搴′簽濠⒀冪仛閹便劍绻濋崨顕呬哗闂佸湱鎳撶€氱増淇婇幖浣肝ㄩ柨鏃€鍎崇紞鎺楁⒒閸屾瑨鍏岄柟铏崌瀹曠敻寮介鐐殿唵闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟�...

Sorry but what are you trying to do actually ?

If i'm not wrong, you should be looking at S12, S13,S14 and S15 to verify your power divider.

I think you might need to read up some basic about microwave first.

For a power divider our s11 ,s22 s33, s44 ,s55 should all be zero isnt that so??

while S parameters only telll you about incident and reflected powers

but what if a person wants to find how much power was input on port1 and how much of it came out at port 2,3,4 or 5

i calculated this by using the above formula which i got from ansoft designer manual for optim tee ??

if this is not the proper way then how should i verify my power divider that its working properly????

what should be my S parametrs if S parametes are used to check it???

Hi

I think you should check out Pozars exellent book "Microwave Engineering". The section about couplers is very useful for your problem.

You device cannot be lossless, reciprocal and matched at all ports at the same time.

The S-parameters tell you how much power is reflected and how much is transfered, i.e. S21, S31....

But I think you should check some litterature first.

Regards

should i see the coupler stuff or the S parameter stuff??

what do u recommend?

Hi

I would say both....I guess you do not have a lot of experience?

If you have no time, then just read coupler.

Else, read both if not more...

Okz, Thanx alot!!! Im goig to find my book see whats going on..............









appreciate your help!!!!

For thread starter information,

A Wilkinson Power Divider is able to achieve the above mention.

Hi

Well not really, the isolation resistor is making the Wilkinson lossy, although only between port 2 and 3.

in my view wilkinson works good under low frequencies At high frequencies like mine (3.5Ghz for wimax) we have to use a T junction

Resistors are lumped elements and use have to use distributed elements at high frequencies above 500mhz

Added after 52 seconds:

After all wilkinson boy uses a resistor

Lossless , Reciprocity and Matched Network at the same time is not possible

U have to compromise on one thing

Seems like you have read up.

Anyway, I have use wilkinson divider up to 11GHz.
You are right that resistor need more attention at higher frequency.

Oh thats great !!!

Were the measured results as expected ?

slight deteriorate but still acceptable.

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top