微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025婵犵數濮撮惀澶愬级鎼存挸浜炬俊銈勭劍閸欏繘鏌i幋锝嗩棄缁炬儳娼¢弻鐔告綇閸撗呮殸缂備胶濯崹鍫曞蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈡晜閽樺缃曢梻浣虹帛閸旀洟骞栭銈囦笉妞ゆ牜鍋為悡銉╂煟閺囩偛鈧湱鈧熬鎷�17闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈡晝閳ь剛绮eΔ浣虹闁瑰瓨鐟ラ悘鈺冪磼閻欌偓閸ㄥ爼寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈠Χ閸屾矮澹曞┑顔结缚閸樠冣枍瀹ュ洠鍋撶憴鍕;闁告濞婇悰顕€宕堕澶嬫櫌婵犵數濮撮幊澶愬磻閹捐閿ゆ俊銈勮兌閸欏棝姊虹紒妯荤闁稿﹤婀遍埀顒佺啲閹凤拷闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍊块柨鏇炲€哥粻鏍煕椤愶絾绀€缁炬儳鐏濋埞鎴︽偐鐎圭姴顥濈紓浣哄閸ㄥ爼寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟�
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > pmc ground plane

pmc ground plane

时间:03-24 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hi,everyone

I am using HFSS to simulate dipole antenna near PMC ground plane. the dipole is parallel close to the PMC ground plane.

when i simulate this dipole antenna for 2.4Ghz centre frequence and place it very close to PMC ground plane 1mm to be exact i get good matched dipole shown by s parameter.

But when i check the farfield pattern at 2.4 Ghz,discovered the dipole antenna is parallel close to the PMC ground plane farfield pattern and dipole antenna is same in the vacuum farfield pattern.

In other words the dipole antenna is parallel close to the PMC ground plane,farfield pattern at 2.4GHz not any change.

If the dipole antenna is parallel close to the PMC ground plane,according to the image theory can produce with the dipole in-phase current in the PMC another end.

Therefore its far fieldfield pattern directivity and gain at 2.4GHz is not can increase
two times?

Some people can help me to explain this phenomenon?

Or the simulation method has the mistake?

Thanks.

kuanfu.

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top