微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閹绢喗鍎夊鑸靛姇缁狙囧箹鐎涙ɑ灏ù婊呭亾娣囧﹪濡堕崟顓炲闂佸憡鐟ョ换姗€寮婚敐澶婄闁挎繂妫Λ鍕磼閻愵剙鍔ゆ繛纭风節瀵鎮㈤崨濠勭Ф闂佸憡鎸嗛崨顔筋啅缂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸靛垔椤撱垹鍨傞柛顐f礀閽冪喖鏌曟繛鐐珕闁稿妫濋弻娑氫沪閸撗€妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛婵°倗濮烽崑鐐烘偋閻樻眹鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珕闂佽姤锚椤︻喚绱旈弴銏♀拻濞达綀娅g敮娑㈡煕閺冣偓濞茬喖鐛弽顓ф晝闁靛牆娲g粭澶婎渻閵堝棛澧遍柛瀣仱閹繝濡烽埡鍌滃幗闂佸搫娲ㄩ崑娑㈠焵椤掆偓濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹02闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛婵°倗濮烽崑鐐烘偋閻樻眹鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珖闂侀€炲苯澧扮紒顕嗙到铻栧ù锝堟椤旀洟姊洪悷鎵憼闁荤喆鍎甸幃姗€鍩¢崘顏嗭紲闂佺粯鐟㈤崑鎾绘煕閵娿儳鍩g€殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛婵°倗濮烽崑鐐烘偋閻樻眹鈧線寮撮姀鐘栄囨煕鐏炲墽鐓瑙勬礀閳规垿顢欑紒鎾剁窗闂佸憡顭嗛崘锝嗙€洪悗骞垮劚濞茬娀宕戦幘鑸靛枂闁告洦鍓涢敍娑㈡⒑閸涘⿴娈曞┑鐐诧躬閹即顢氶埀顒€鐣烽崼鏇ㄦ晢濠㈣泛顑嗗▍灞解攽閻樺灚鏆╁┑顔芥尦楠炲﹥寰勯幇顒傦紱闂佽宕橀褔鏌ㄩ妶鍡曠箚闁靛牆瀚崗宀勬煕濞嗗繑顥㈡慨濠呮缁辨帒螣閼姐値妲梻浣呵归敃銈咃耿闁秴鐒垫い鎺嶈兌閸熸煡鏌熼崙銈嗗濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴f閺嬩線鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳顭烽弻锝夊箛椤掍焦鍎撻梺鎼炲妼閸婂潡寮诲☉銏╂晝闁挎繂妫涢ˇ銉х磽娴e搫鞋妞ゎ偄顦垫俊鐢稿礋椤栨氨鐤€闂佸憡鎸烽懗鍫曞汲閻樼數纾藉ù锝呮惈椤庡矂鏌涢妸銉у煟鐎殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > vivaldi .hfss

vivaldi .hfss

时间:03-23 整理:3721RD 点击:
I am wonding this question:

Which one is more accurate between CST and HFSS ?

Currently I simulate 3D antenna problems ( dielectric resonator antennas) , and find that the results
such as s11 are quite different from the two softwares even so I input the same structure parameters including geometrical and electrical ,
usually, S11 from HFSS is about 15 better than one from CST.
So, I am wondering which results should be inputed for fabrication.

I guess there should be some important setting such as meshing, or others some things, but I have no experience.
Does anyone who has this expereince give your suggestion ? I understand my question may be too general to answer, but your any general experience for accurate solution in CST or HFSS is greatly appreciated !

it may be a good practise to use adaptive meshing in CST till you get the desired accuracy.

HFSS uses FEM while MWS uses FDTD. The obvious difference lies on the way the mesh created. Common structures have sometimes different ways to have accurate mesh, and usually rule of thumb for this is provided by the company.

What kind of structure are you modeling?

Hi,
I have a same problem with HFSS and CST,
please visite this forum:
https://www.edaboard.com/viewtopic.p...hlight=vivaldi
It is my vivaldi antenna simulation and meaturment results, My simulations carried out with HFSS, simulated S11 are not in agreement with meaturment results. But when eirp ( Thanks eirp!) simulated it with CST, we saw that CST results are good agreement with HFSS.

KMPA

Hi, thanks a lot for all your help.

I have used your suggestion, but the difference between the two results is still quite large. I understand that it should be due to my settings for some parameters. but i don't know how to adjust which one of them. Now I attached two modes used in HFSS and CST, and a related paper. My question is below:

I hope to shife the band to around 1.8 ~ 2.5 GHz, and CST and HFSS could get the rough same results. ( ps: if slot width /2 =0.25 mm, and strip width/2=0.94 mm, the result from HFSS can basically match the above requirement. but the one from CST .

Could you please take a glance for my question and modify modes for me?

Thanks a lot again.

Hi Ethen,

your *.par file for the MWS is missing.

Best regards,

F.

Yes, noted it also.
However the structure can be retrieved
HFSS --> export SAT
MWS <-- import SAT

Simulating now :)

Cheers

eirp

Hi Eirp,

can you post the SAT file? I don't have HFSS

Thanks,

F.

Hi , Eirp:


Thank you very much for your help. I am waiting for your results and modification to the structure.

Hi, RF simulator:

Thank you very much for your interst

Sat is here, but how to edit inport shapes ? it seems that CST doesn't know sat file from HFSS, what commond can be used to edit this structure of sat file from HFSS ?

I can't see my uploaded files, it is not permitted ?


Hi, Eirp, could you send your feedback to me by rao88168@hotmail.com, thank you very much. :o

Thank all who has been interested in helping me, please reach me by the above email.

Here's the imported structure for MWS.
I hope I didn't make mistake in materials. I also had to make finite thickness on mstrip.
Sorry I don't have enough time to make more investigation on this structure

cheers

eirp

I did run Eirps structure with three different mesh. I increase the mesh globally but in particular along the M-Strip, inside the substrate and inside the feeding slot. As you can see, the result is pretty much converged. From a numerical point of view I would guarantee for the results.

Eirp, just a short comment from my side concerning your port definition. I would not extend the WG Port for a M-Strip to underneath the ground plane. This sometimes can lead to problems and is certainly not necessary.

Substrate and dielectric are modelled without losses. Sometimes this can have a large effect on the return loss.

F.

上一篇:SuperNEC
下一篇:最后一页

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top