微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025濠电姷鏁告慨鎾儉婢舵劕绾ч幖瀛樻尭娴滅偓淇婇妶鍕妽闁告瑥绻橀弻锝夊箣閿濆棭妫勭紒鐐劤濞硷繝寮婚悢鍛婄秶闁告挆鍛缂傚倷鑳舵刊顓㈠垂閸洖钃熼柕濞炬櫆閸嬪棝鏌涚仦鍓р槈妞ゅ骏鎷�04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫆闁芥ê顦純鏇㈡⒒娴h櫣甯涢柛鏃€娲熼獮鏍敃閵堝洣绗夊銈嗙墱閸嬬偤鎮¢妷鈺傜厽闁哄洨鍋涢埀顒€婀遍埀顒佺啲閹凤拷09闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰缁絽螖娴h櫣顔曢梺鐟扮摠閻熴儵鎮橀埡鍐<闁绘瑢鍋撻柛銊ョ埣瀵濡搁埡鍌氫簽闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴︻敂閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏犖ч柛灞剧煯婢规洖鈹戦缁撶細闁告鍐f瀺鐎广儱娲犻崑鎾舵喆閸曨剛锛涢梺鍛婎殕婵炲﹪鎮伴鈧畷鍫曨敆婢跺娅屽┑鐘垫暩婵挳骞婃径鎰;闁规崘顕ч柨銈嗕繆閵堝嫯鍏岄柛娆忔濮婅櫣绱掑Ο鑽ゎ槬闂佺ǹ锕ゅ﹢閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Ь椤濡甸崟顖氱疀闁告挷鑳堕弳鐘电磽娴e搫顎岄柛銊ョ埣瀵濡搁埡鍌氫簽闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴︻敂閿燂拷
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 电磁仿真讨论 > waveguide slot antenna

waveguide slot antenna

时间:03-23 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hi everyone!

I've serious problems with the simulation of a waveguide slot antenna.
It has a single slot on the Broadwall of the waveguide and the frequency is 10GHz. it has one port, located at λ/2 of the slot, and is terminated by a short circuit at 3*λ/4 from the slot.
I'm trying to find the resonant length of the slot for a fixed offset, by parametric sweeps of the length, to get a 0 degree for the angle of the admittance mattrix.

normally, as written in the ansoft hfss 9.1 help documents, a boundary of λ/4 from the slot should do. But the angle of admittance, which I'm very sensitive on, varies a lot with changes of the boundary.

I've used some seed meshing on the slot and the boundary, but it doesn't help much.

How could i get a reliable answer???

Plzzz...help me!!

thanks in advance

sara

Hi,
what about to use PML instead of radation BC.

Pml are less sensitive to the angle of incidence and allow you to calculate
antenna parametr

Hope this help

Rugby

I suspect the problem is not on radiation boundary. Something wrong in other part of your setup.

The boundary cover of λ/4 from the slot seems too small, you must set one-λ at least. No problem in HFSS to get all parameters of you desired.

Hi

with a λ bounadry, it'll take years to solve the problem and it'll take too much memory, and the meshs won't get as dense as it must.

In a Ansoft 2003 Global seminars, there was a section about generating a slot design curve for a broadwall displaced slot design. The curve showed the resonant length of wave guide slot vs. offset distance. The boundary was stated as λ/4. It had done sweeps for a fixed air box and waveguide structure, with just the change of slot's offset and length. with a little change in the air box, everything will change.
I asked the writter of the seminar, and he answered this, with no more explanation or reply to my mail:
" You are right that you set 1/4 lambda of radiation box. But you did not
tell me other settings when solve: Delta S, number of passes, etc.
I have some comments for your case(wave guide slot antenna):
1. make seed mesh on radiation boundary and the slot. For the radiation
boundary, the default mesh is 1/3 lambda in HFSS v9. Please make 1/6 or 1/8
lambda seeding mesh( for your case, 10GHz, 4mm or 5mm is OK). For the slot,
you'd better make about 1/10 of the slot length seeding.
2. build a "virtual object" around the slot to make the mesh better( not so
long and thin mesh)


What about pmls? Are responses with PMLs really accurate? and how should i choose it's settings?

Thanks a lot
sara

Hi

To a single slot, it'll not take too much time & memory if set a λ bounadry. PML is good for pattern computation. If you only want S-parameters, ABC is accurate enough. Build a "virtual object" around the slot is a tradeoff way.

thanks!
XuQing

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top