微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025濠电姷鏁告慨鎾儉婢舵劕绾ч幖瀛樻尭娴滅偓淇婇妶鍕妽闁告瑥绻橀弻锝夊箣閿濆棭妫勭紒鐐劤濞硷繝寮婚悢鍛婄秶闁告挆鍛缂傚倷鑳舵刊顓㈠垂閸洖钃熼柕濞炬櫆閸嬪棝鏌涚仦鍓р槈妞ゅ骏鎷�04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫆闁芥ê顦純鏇㈡⒒娴h櫣甯涢柛鏃€娲熼獮鏍敃閵堝洣绗夊銈嗙墱閸嬬偤鎮¢妷鈺傜厽闁哄洨鍋涢埀顒€婀遍埀顒佺啲閹凤拷14闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰缁絽螖娴h櫣顔曢梺鐟扮摠閻熴儵鎮橀埡鍐<闁绘瑢鍋撻柛銊ョ埣瀵濡搁埡鍌氫簽闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴︻敂閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏犖ч柛灞剧煯婢规洖鈹戦缁撶細闁告鍐f瀺鐎广儱娲犻崑鎾舵喆閸曨剛锛涢梺鍛婎殕婵炲﹪鎮伴鈧畷鍫曨敆婢跺娅屽┑鐘垫暩婵挳骞婃径鎰;闁规崘顕ч柨銈嗕繆閵堝嫯鍏岄柛娆忔濮婅櫣绱掑Ο鑽ゎ槬闂佺ǹ锕ゅ﹢閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊寮婚悢铏圭<闁靛繒濮甸悘鍫㈢磼閻愵剙鍔ゆい顓犲厴瀵濡搁埡鍌氫簽闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴︻敂閿燂拷
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 天线设计和射频技术 > Flex-Rigid PCB RF design

Flex-Rigid PCB RF design

时间:04-06 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hello!

I have a RF reference circuit at 2.4Ghz designed with transmision lines (balun) in 0.8mm separated 2 layer pcb. We are going to design this circuit in a flex-rigid PCB. Instead of having

copper/FR4/copper

we have

Copper/kapton/FR4/copper/FR4/Copper/FR4/Copper

We can mantain 0.8mm of thickness but the 4.2 permittivity needed, is "disturbed" by 60um of kapton (permittivity 3.5).

Anyone knows how to calculate the effective permittivity of the PCB? Do you think that this kapton material can vary a lot the RF performance?

The equivalent value for this sandwich is t=0.86mm with permittivity 4.14
The deviation in permittvity is small compared to the large tolerances of FR4 permittivity.
For the change in substrate thickness, you might want to check in your circuit simulator / EM simulator.

Manufacturer say us that the final tickness is going to be is exactly 0.8mm. How do you calculate the total permittivity? Thanks!

I have an in-house tool for that, because it is frequently used for my work on RFIC technologies.
Calculation is based on parallel plate capacitance and the equivalent permittivity of cascaded (series) parallel plate capacitors.

Thanks for the help! And what about tangent loss? Does it change a lot?

I think that everithing is going to work ok because the change is less than material tolerance...

Good question. I did a quick web search and learned that Kapton for PCB is "Dupont Pyralux".
http://www2.dupont.com/Pyralux/en_US...ad_H-73241.pdf
According to the data sheet, the loss tangent is less (better) than FR4.

So I think your design is fine, without modifications.

Hi! Thanks for the help. Just for demonstrate my decision... is there any way to easily calculate the multilayer permittivity? Thanks!

Here's the code:

totalThickness := 0;
totalErel := 0;
for n:=first to last do begin

aDielectric := getDielectric(n);
totalThickness := totalThickness + aDielectric.Thickness;
totalErel := totalErel + aDielectric.Thickness/aDielectric.erel;
end;
totalErel := totalThickness/totalErel;

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top