measured and simlated results not matching
Please somebody help me what can I do in this.
Is this any CST problem? or setting I have to change for higher frequencies.?
measured results not exactly matching predicted results from some program? Say its not so!
From your plot actually I see that your measurements just barely match the simulation at only few frequencies. Otherwise, differences are all over the places.
Interesting is that you get better measurement results than the simulator. So you can get rid the expensive simulator from now.
but to send the work in any journal I need to show the good match between the simulated and measured results
The biggest error source in EM simulation is the user, not the software. If you just used the defaults, results can be good or bad. Nobody knows, because every EM model is different. You need to learn how to use your EM tool, and what good settings are for your models.
You need to understand why measured and simulated don't agree (enough) to make progress in your work. You define what is good enough, because only you know what the design requirements are.
To publishing the work in a journal, you don't need simulations. What you need is some new scientific work that was not already published by others. If it's relevant and new, and measurements show good performance, go ahead. Even if you have measurements and simulations that don't agree, and you can explain why there is a difference, that's ok.
simlated measured matching 相关文章:
- Measured and simulated reflection coefficient s11 comparison
- measured and simulated S11 of a patch antenna
- Measured realized gain pattern values
- VSWR(measured by Input impedance) and S11 is different
- how to study measured radiation pattern
- de-embedding device leads from measured s-parameters of the device
