微波EDA网,见证研发工程师的成长! 2025婵犵數濮撮惀澶愬级鎼存挸浜炬俊銈勭劍閸欏繘鏌i幋锝嗩棄缁炬儳娼¢弻鐔告綇閸撗呮殸缂備胶濯崹鍫曞蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷04闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈡晜閽樺缃曢梻浣虹帛閸旀洟骞栭銈囦笉妞ゆ牜鍋為悡銉╂煟閺囩偛鈧湱鈧熬鎷�03闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈡晝閳ь剛绮eΔ浣虹闁瑰瓨鐟ラ悘鈺冪磼閻欌偓閸ㄥ爼寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇㈠Χ閸屾矮澹曞┑顔结缚閸樠冣枍瀹ュ洠鍋撶憴鍕;闁告濞婇悰顕€宕堕澶嬫櫌婵犵數濮撮幊澶愬磻閹捐閿ゆ俊銈勮兌閸欏棝姊虹紒妯荤闁稿﹤婀遍埀顒佺啲閹凤拷闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍊块柨鏇炲€哥粻鏍煕椤愶絾绀€缁炬儳鐏濋埞鎴︽偐鐎圭姴顥濈紓浣哄閸ㄥ爼寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟�
首页 > 研发问答 > 微波和射频技术 > 天线设计和射频技术 > diffrent results in hfss feko and cst

diffrent results in hfss feko and cst

时间:04-04 整理:3721RD 点击:
Hi,

Hope everybody are good.

Please find attached full question with diagrams.Question.pdfQuestion.pdf

A coax-fed patch antenna with dimensions given in table below, is simulated in HFSS, CST and FEKO
softwares.

It is seen that:


The results of the CST software in the case of

- The phase Z component of the electric field on the line parallel to y axis
and
The results of the FEKO software in the case of

- The magnitude of X component of the electric field on the line parallel to y axis
- The phase of X component of the electric field on the line parallel to y axis
- The phase of Z component of the electric field on the line parallel to y axis
- The phase of Z component of the electric field on the line parallel to x axis
and


The results of the HFSS software in the case of

- The phase of X component of the electric field on the line parallel to y axis
- The phase of Z component of the electric field on the line parallel to y axis

are completely different from the results of the two other softwares (despite partial similarity of the field
behavior in other cases).

The question is why it is such different.

Have you checked local mesh density in the area where you sample the fields?

Thank you for your reply.
yes we checked that and also we checked for different meshes and we got same results again.

Ok.

To me, the spikes in the fields looked like an artefact from insuffient mesh density in the probed region.

上一篇:Transmission zero in ADS
下一篇:最后一页

Copyright © 2017-2020 微波EDA网 版权所有

网站地图

Top