HFSS Interpolating vs Discrete Sweep (S11 match but not S21)
时间:03-29
整理:3721RD
点击:
Hi everyone,
I am doing a simulation of two Vivaldi antennas working from 4-8 GHz separated by a distance of 500mm with PEC cylinder in between (Screenshot attached). I want to obtain the scattering parameters for them.
While interpolating sweep is giving close results to discrete sweep for Return Loss(S11), the Insertion Loss(S21) has a awkward curve at lower frequency range. I have attached a screenshot of the scattering parameters ( Dashed Lines - Interpolating sweep, Solid Lines - Discrete Sweep).
If anyone can shed some light as to why by using interpolating sweep I am getting such a good match with Discrete sweep (which is accurate) for S11 while I don't get it for S21. Correct me if I am wrong but aren't both parameter calculations supposed to be dependent on one another ?
I am using Iterative Solver with solution frequency at 8 GHz.
Thanks in advance
I am doing a simulation of two Vivaldi antennas working from 4-8 GHz separated by a distance of 500mm with PEC cylinder in between (Screenshot attached). I want to obtain the scattering parameters for them.
While interpolating sweep is giving close results to discrete sweep for Return Loss(S11), the Insertion Loss(S21) has a awkward curve at lower frequency range. I have attached a screenshot of the scattering parameters ( Dashed Lines - Interpolating sweep, Solid Lines - Discrete Sweep).
If anyone can shed some light as to why by using interpolating sweep I am getting such a good match with Discrete sweep (which is accurate) for S11 while I don't get it for S21. Correct me if I am wrong but aren't both parameter calculations supposed to be dependent on one another ?
I am using Iterative Solver with solution frequency at 8 GHz.
Thanks in advance
Hi. It may be because the phase of S21 varies much faster than the phase of S11.