Simulation results vs. measured ones

I've just built a printed Ifa 2.4 - 5.5 dual band that I designed with MWO. Measured results are accurated ( more or less ) but simulating the same geometry with Zeland I've reach different results. The band in 2.4 doesn't seem to work in simulation ( but works OK in mesurement ), and I'd like to know which could be the reason of this disagreement. Thanks in advance

Hi, Javirulo: You can send me the .geo and .sim (containing the frequency of interest) to me. I can help you (jian@zeland.com).

Thanks Jian :

It works perfectly, simulations with IE3D are even more accurated than the ones I obtained with MWO. Thank you very much, I was really blocked at this point.

Regards and have a nice week ;)

Hi, Javirulo: You are welcomed. I am glad that my suggestion works.