CC2540 如何连续读取characteristic的handle?
时间:10-02
整理:3721RD
点击:
在一个服务里面定义了4个char,每个都有read权限,在central代码里测试了下,发现只有第一个跟第三个的char可以读,第二个第四个读不到信息,若循环读取同一个char,则是一次能读到则下一次不能读到,这样看来是无法连续读取两个handle?请问下是否是连续读取时有何讲究或者判断条件有问题?
static void simpleBLEGATTDiscoveryEvent( gattMsgEvent_t *pMsg )
{
attReadByTypeReq_t req;
if ( simpleBLEDiscState == BLE_DISC_STATE_SVC )
{
// Service found, store handles
if ( pMsg->method == ATT_FIND_BY_TYPE_VALUE_RSP &&
pMsg->msg.findByTypeValueRsp.numInfo > 0 )
{
simpleBLESvcStartHdl = pMsg->msg.findByTypeValueRsp.handlesInfo[0].handle;
simpleBLESvcEndHdl = pMsg->msg.findByTypeValueRsp.handlesInfo[0].grpEndHandle;
}
if ( ( pMsg->method == ATT_FIND_BY_TYPE_VALUE_RSP &&
pMsg->hdr.status == bleProcedureComplete ) ||
( pMsg->method == ATT_ERROR_RSP ) )
{
if ( simpleBLESvcStartHdl != 0 )
{
// Discover characteristic
simpleBLEDiscState = BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR1;
req.startHandle = simpleBLESvcStartHdl;
req.endHandle = simpleBLESvcEndHdl;
req.type.len = ATT_BT_UUID_SIZE;
req.type.uuid[0] = LO_UINT16(CHAR1_UUID);
req.type.uuid[1] = HI_UINT16(CHAR1_UUID);
GATT_ReadUsingCharUUID( simpleBLEConnHandle, &req, simpleBLETaskId );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "GATT_Read CHAR1_UUID\r\n", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
}
}
}
else if ( simpleBLEDiscState == BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR1 )
{
// Tel number found, store handle
if ( ( pMsg->method == ATT_READ_BY_TYPE_RSP &&
pMsg->hdr.status == bleProcedureComplete ) ||
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.numPairs > 0 )
{
if ( simpleBLESvcStartHdl != 0 )
{
TelNumCharHdl = BUILD_UINT16( pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[0],
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[1] );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR1 Found:", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
simpleBLEDiscState = BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR2;
req.startHandle = simpleBLESvcStartHdl;
req.endHandle = simpleBLESvcEndHdl;
req.type.len = ATT_BT_UUID_SIZE;
req.type.uuid[0] = LO_UINT16(CHAR2_UUID);
req.type.uuid[1] = HI_UINT16(CHAR2_UUID);
GATT_ReadUsingCharUUID( simpleBLEConnHandle, &req, simpleBLETaskId );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "GATT_Read CHAR2\r\n", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
}
}
}
else if ( simpleBLEDiscState == BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR2 )
{
if ( ( pMsg->method == ATT_READ_BY_TYPE_RSP &&
pMsg->hdr.status == bleProcedureComplete ) ||
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.numPairs > 0 )
{
if ( simpleBLESvcStartHdl != 0 )
{
TelNumCharHdl = BUILD_UINT16( pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[0],
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[1] );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR2 Found:", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
simpleBLEDiscState = BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR3;
req.startHandle = simpleBLESvcStartHdl;
req.endHandle = simpleBLESvcEndHdl;
req.type.len = ATT_BT_UUID_SIZE;
req.type.uuid[0] = LO_UINT16(CHAR3_UUID);
req.type.uuid[1] = HI_UINT16(CHAR3_UUID);
GATT_ReadUsingCharUUID( simpleBLEConnHandle, &req, simpleBLETaskId );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "GATT_Read CHAR3\r\n", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
}
}
}
else if ( simpleBLEDiscState == BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR3 )
{
if ( ( pMsg->method == ATT_READ_BY_TYPE_RSP &&
pMsg->hdr.status == bleProcedureComplete ) ||
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.numPairs > 0 )
{
if ( simpleBLESvcStartHdl != 0 )
{
TelNumCharHdl = BUILD_UINT16( pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[0],
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[1] );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR3 Found:", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
simpleBLEDiscState = BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR4;
req.startHandle = simpleBLESvcStartHdl;
req.endHandle = simpleBLESvcEndHdl;
req.type.len = ATT_BT_UUID_SIZE;
req.type.uuid[0] = LO_UINT16(CHAR4_UUID);
req.type.uuid[1] = HI_UINT16(CHAR4_UUID);
GATT_ReadUsingCharUUID( simpleBLEConnHandle, &req, simpleBLETaskId );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "GATT_Read CHAR4\r\n", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
}
}
}
else if ( simpleBLEDiscState == BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR4 )
{
// Tel number found, store handle
if ( ( pMsg->method == ATT_READ_BY_TYPE_RSP &&
pMsg->hdr.status == bleProcedureComplete ) ||
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.numPairs > 0 )
{
if ( simpleBLESvcStartHdl != 0 )
{
TelNumCharHdl = BUILD_UINT16( pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[0],
pMsg->msg.readByTypeRsp.dataList[1] );
LCD_WRITE_STRING( "BLE_DISC_STATE_CHAR4 Found:", HAL_LCD_LINE_1 );
}
}
simpleBLEDiscState = BLE_DISC_STATE_IDLE;
}
}
感觉这样不行啊
一个服务里面四个char肯定是可以单独操作的
首先检查一下代码为什么只有其中两个可以读
看看回调函数里面是不是也修改了
