有关"天线圣经"的误传
时间：10-02
整理：3721RD
点击：
在国外, "天线圣经"应该是指Kraus的那本"Antennas", 而不是大家以为的Balanis的"Antenna Theory".
Balanis的书比Kraus晚出了30年, 影响力差一些.
虽然Balanis的书也很好, 而且比Kraus的好懂些, 但毕竟是张冠李戴了.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Kraus
Bibliography
* Antennas, 1950, 1st edition, published by McGraw-Hill was a monumental work, in which the helical antenna Kraus invented is described in detail (Chapter 7). Even though mathematical rigor and the attention to detail was typical of the time, this book set standards and was referred to by many as the Antenna Bible.
Balanis的书比Kraus晚出了30年, 影响力差一些.
虽然Balanis的书也很好, 而且比Kraus的好懂些, 但毕竟是张冠李戴了.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Kraus
Bibliography
* Antennas, 1950, 1st edition, published by McGraw-Hill was a monumental work, in which the helical antenna Kraus invented is described in detail (Chapter 7). Even though mathematical rigor and the attention to detail was typical of the time, this book set standards and was referred to by many as the Antenna Bible.
不知道那个才是我们要学习的圣经，只有高手指点了。
中国的天线业发展起步晚,没办法.
一直认为kraus的天线才是圣经，第一次听说Balanis的书，决定买本回去看
一个偏教材类，一个偏手册类。都是经典。
都是经典，也就都是圣经了，
何必要以他人的说法为准呢?那只是可以作为参考的说法而已。你自己认为某本书籍是你的圣经，那就是你的圣经了！相信自己的鉴别与判断，也借鉴他人的观点。